What the research found
| Grade or subject | Finding | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Preschool to 1st grade | One-on-one beat pairs and small groups: 0.51 SD in preschool and kindergarten, 0.44 SD in 1st grade | J-PAL, summarizing the 2020 meta-analysis |
| Grades 2–5 | Groups of three or more did better (0.46 SD) than one-on-one (0.25 SD) | J-PAL |
| All grades, teachers and paraprofessionals as tutors | One-on-one had the largest effects, but larger groups were statistically similar; the authors say grade level mattered more than group size | Nickow, Oreopoulos and Quan |
| All grades, a 2024 review | 0.43 SD for one-on-one, 0.41 for pairs, 0.30 for groups of three and 0.34 for groups of four, with no statistically significant differences | Kraft, Schueler and Falken |
| Reading | One-on-one produces greater gains than small groups on average, in elementary and secondary grades | EdResearch brief, 2024 |
| Elementary math | Small groups can produce equal or better results than one-on-one | Same brief |
The National Student Support Accelerator sums it up as one-on-one being the most effective format but also the most costly, with groups of no more than three balancing effectiveness and cost (toolkit). Its pages put the upper limit at three or four students per tutor.
Experiments that compared group sizes
- 1st-grade reading: in a 2012 study, 85 Reading Recovery teachers each taught struggling 1st graders both one-on-one and in groups of 2, 3 or 5. One-on-one produced significantly higher results than the small groups combined on 8 of 9 measures, and results trended lower as groups grew (study summary).
- Kindergarten math: in a randomized trial of the ROOTS math program, children taught in groups of two didn't do measurably better than children taught in groups of five (Clarke and others, 2017).
- Online middle school math: in a small study, one-on-one online tutoring outscored groups of three, though the difference wasn't statistically significant, and tutors said small online groups made it harder to personalize, build relationships and keep everyone participating (Kraft and Lovison, 2024).
Which fits your child
| One-on-one fits better | A small group of 2–4 fits well |
|---|---|
| A kindergartner or 1st grader learning to read | Elementary math practice, where explaining to each other helps |
| A child who is far behind, or whose gaps are unusual | Two or three friends or siblings at a similar level |
| A child who goes quiet or drifts in a group | A child who works harder with a peer |
| Online sessions, where groups are harder to run | A fixed budget for more sessions per week |
A group only works if the children are close in level and working on the same skills. If a group spans very different levels, everyone gets less.
Prices
Thousand Acorns Tutoring teaches small groups of 2 to 4 children at $50 an hour per child, compared with $80 an hour in your home or online one-on-one. Among local providers that publish both, Oaks Christian Learning Center in Westlake Village lists $80 for a 60-minute one-on-one session and $60 per session for two students with one tutor (Oaks Christian, opened October 13, 2026). More local prices are in what tutoring costs in Thousand Oaks.
Questions parents ask
Is one-on-one tutoring better than a small group?
For kindergarten and 1st-grade readers, one-on-one has the stronger evidence. For grades 2–5, the 2020 meta-analysis found groups of three or more did as well or better, and a 2024 review found no statistically significant difference between one-on-one and groups of two to four.
What is a good tutoring group size?
Research summaries describe the most effective programs as having no more than three students per tutor, and Stanford's National Student Support Accelerator found only small differences between groups of two and four. Thousand Acorns Tutoring's small groups are 2 to 4 children.
Does a small group work for reading?
For beginning readers, one-on-one is usually stronger: in one randomized study of struggling 1st-grade readers, one-on-one beat the small groups (sizes 2, 3 and 5 combined) on 8 of 9 measures. Once a child is reading, a small group can work well for comprehension and writing.
How much cheaper is small-group tutoring?
It depends on the provider. Thousand Acorns Tutoring charges per child for groups. Locally, Oaks Christian Learning Center publishes $80 for a 60-minute one-on-one session and $60 per session for two students with one tutor.
Sources
- J-PAL North America, evidence review: The transformative potential of tutoring for PreK-12 learning outcomes, 2020. Opened October 13, 2026.
- Nickow, Oreopoulos and Quan (NBER working paper 27476), July 2020. Opened October 13, 2026.
- Kraft, Schueler and Falken (EdWorkingPaper 24-1031), October 2024. Opened October 13, 2026.
- Robinson, Kraft, Loeb and Schueler, Design Principles for Accelerating Student Learning with High-Impact Tutoring (EdResearch for Action brief 30), June 2024. Opened October 13, 2026.
- National Student Support Accelerator: tutoring model dimensions, undated. Opened October 13, 2026.
- National Student Support Accelerator toolkit, section 2, undated. Opened October 13, 2026.
- Schwartz and others, teacher-student ratio in first-grade reading intervention (NSSA study summary), 2012. Opened October 13, 2026.
- Clarke and others, ROOTS kindergarten math group size trial (ERIC), 2017. Opened October 13, 2026.
- Kraft and Lovison, one-on-one versus small-group online math tutoring (EdWorkingPaper 24-976), June 2024. Opened October 13, 2026.
- Oaks Christian Learning Center: programs for all students, opened October 13, 2026. Opened October 13, 2026.